Blog Post

Co-designing professional development

By Mark Chandler and the Professional Development Working Group
– – –
One of the more egregious sins of blog writing may well be using jargon, but it seems unavoidable when wanting to write about professional development. The terms “professional” and “development,” let alone the two brought together, are open to all sorts of interpretations, especially in the world citizen science. Yet most of us have experienced professional development in one form or another and find it helpful and important when done well. We use the term to mean learning, capacity building, and idea-sharing opportunities that aim to improve the significance and effectiveness of citizen science, especially through the use of evidence-based practices for enhancing project success.
Here we kick off a series of blog posts from the Professional Development Working Group, specifically to invite input into the CSA’s design of professional development (“PD”) resources and support that are accessible and relevant to this diverse community of practitioners. Professional development itself is diverse, and may take the form of conferences, blogs, workshops, books, online resources, and conversations that lead to changed individual practices and discussions across our community of practitioners. In some contexts PD can also include the building-up and strengthening of institutions to deliver impactful citizen science. Some activities may aim to distribute knowledge to large audiences across large geographical scales (e.g., via literature through open access publishing; web-based learning; conferences), while others may directly target audiences (sometimes one-to-one or small groups) in specific locations (e.g., through workshops, correspondence and mentoring schemes).
Our membership includes people working with online citizen science, community-based monitoring, crowd-sourced contributory citizen science, community science, and more, and involves research in almost every scientific discipline. This variety raises several fundamental questions for you, our community of practice, as we prioritize PD activities:

  1. What are your PD needs related to citizen science?  What resources would be most useful?
  2. What PD related to citizen science have you found useful to date?
  3. Where do you access these resources (e.g. training programs, colleagues, online tool kits etc.)?

Seeking to support PD for the great diversity of audiences found in our community has been identified as a priority for the Citizen Science Association. Given the diversity of interests within the citizen science community, a number of key questions about professional development  arise. What are the priority needs? What resources are already in  use and can we make these more accessible? What are the best mechanisms for accessing PD for the most people? We are seeking input from the citizen science community to explore these questions.
The working group is excited about supporting a range of professional needs of CS community going forward. We are launching  a new blog series to initiate and stimulate conversation across the citizen science  community around PD. The conversations will help us to provide a set of resources on the CSA website, support symposia or workshops, and build a stronger citizen science network over time.
To start the dialogue, we have identified an early list of some modes of PD that could inspire the professional development working group, including resources on the CSA website. These include:

To the citizen science community we ask: What what kinds of professional development would support YOUR needs? What formats are accessible to you, and what would you make most use of?  We are excited about how the direction and flow of the conversation will be modulated by input from the incredible community of practice that exists. Please share your thoughts in the comments below.

One thought on “Co-designing professional development

  • Raleigh McLemore

    Not sure I’m in the right spot here but maybe someone will direct me to the correct area if I am speaking out of turn at this site.
    My wife and I volunteer for a number of citizen science projects as do all or most of the others at this site. I am a retired science teacher. I am debating whether to join CSA. My questions about dues paying revolve around the idea “How will being part of this group help us expand and improve our involvement in citizen science.” Generally I’ve felt that some/most of the articles I’ve read so far are too abstract for my blood. Looking for an organization that broadens my idea of what I can do.
    The kind of questions we have: “What projects are out there, where are they, what kind of commitment required…” aren’t obvious on this site to me.
    Personally I’d like to see experiences in science volunteering that, if appropriate, then link to how others might become involved.
    As an example, we volunteer with the Golden Gate Raptor Observatory, in the SF Bay Area. A short piece over what we do, when we do it, how we do it and what we have gained might be useful. It could easily end with how others might become involved. The professional development, in this case, is excellent and provided to folks who volunteer.

Comments are closed.

Related Posts